Connecticut DEEP Contemplates Microgrid Program Revisions

Dec. 26, 2014
Connecticut officials are considering changes to the state’s microgrid program, a first-of-its-kind grant offering. Clean Energy Group’s Todd Olinsky-Paul explains the proposed legislative and regulatory action.

Todd Olinsky-Paul, Clean Energy Group

Connecticut officials are considering changes to the state’s microgrid program, a first-of-its-kind grant offering.  Clean Energy Group’s Todd Olinsky-Paul explains the proposed legislative and regulatory action.

The hallmark of good programs is that they keep getting better. Last month, Clean Energy States Alliance awarded a State Leadership in Clean Energy (SLICE) award to the Connecticut Department of Energy and Environmental Protection (CT DEEP) for its groundbreaking resilient power microgrids grant and loan program. This month, CT DEEP wrapped up an information-gathering process designed to solicit stakeholder input for program revisions, and we are happy to report that several significant improvements are under consideration for Round 3 of the program, scheduled for 2015.

One major issue for municipalities, which are the intended audience for the solicitation, has been CT DEEP’s inability to provide grant funding for purchases of generation and storage equipment. This is the result of the original legislation that created the program. CT DEEP has submitted a proposed legislative amendment that would allow generation and storage to be funded, within the $3 million per-project cap. A decision on this is pending.

A number of other program revisions now under consideration do not require legislative action. These include:

  • Increasing the maximum percentage of generation capacity that can be provided by existing diesel generators, if matched by increased renewable generation and storage capacity
  • Reducing the number of connected buildings required to meet the state’s definition of a microgrid
  • Offering high-level pre-application technical and financing assistance to municipalities on request
  • Reducing the required duration of islanded operation (the current requirement is four weeks)
  • Offering rolling application deadlines to allow a better fit with related incentives, such as REC auctions
  • Offering a vendor list to help municipalities build project teams

It is important to note that these changes are merely under consideration; a good deal more internal discussion will need to take place before these issues are decided, and programmatic changes are made. However, we agree that it is important to listen to stakeholders, and we congratulate CT DEEP on its commitment to continual improvement.

The third round of microgrids funding in Connecticut will be the final one under the current program. CT DEEP anticipates awarding about $25 million in Round 3. That’s at least eight new microgrids, and perhaps more. The state has already awarded grants to 11 microgrids in the previous two rounds of the solicitation.

To learn more about CT DEEP’s microgrids program, click here. To view a webinar on this program and an award-winning New York CHP program, click here.

This blog was originally posted on Clean Energy Group’s blog.

About the Author

Kevin Normandeau | Publisher

Kevin is a veteran of the publishing industry having worked for brands like PC World, AOL, Network World, Data Center Knowledge and other business to business sites. He focuses on industry trends in the energy efficiency industry.

gettyimages1341067688_sdl__1320x755

Revolutionizing Defense: The Crucial Role of Microgrids and Schneider Electric in Department of Defense Energy Resiliency

Sept. 13, 2024
Last month, the North American Electric Reliability Corporation (NERC) said that U.S. power grids are becoming more susceptible to cyberattacks every day, with vulnerable attack...

MGK_MesaWPCover2020-12-11_15-24-21

How to Get Off the Electric Grid, Stabilize Cost & Increase Efficiency

This new report from Mesa Solutios explores how to get off the electric grid, and do it while retaining and increasing reliability, efficiency, and cost stability. “There’s a ...