Connecticut to Take Deeper Look at Microgrids; Plans New CHP Incentives

Dec. 12, 2014
Connecticut looks at some of the tougher challenges associated with microgrids — a fitting task for a state that has been a leader in microgrid development.

You might say the honeymoon is over and the real work of developing microgrids has begun in Connecticut.

The state described some of the microgrid challenges ahead within a draft integrated resource plan released this week. Issued every two years, the plan maps energy strategy for the next decade with an eye toward electricity costs, supply, technology and policy.

Connecticut was one of the first — some would argue the first — U.S. state to seriously pursue microgrids, focusing on the technology even before the 2012 SuperStorm Sandy.

Given its early entry into the market, it’s fitting that Connecticut is now taking on some of the tougher challenges associated with integrating the new tech into an old grid.

The state took on a decidedly ‘knuckle down’ tone about microgrids, describing a need to develop  standards and guidelines and overcome technical, operational, and economic issues.

“Microgrids are a rather new technology being implemented across the world. As the projects are being installed and operated, there will be challenges encountered and lessons learned,” said the Department of Energy and Environmental Protection in the draft plan.

For example, much is left to figure out about microgrid economics — who pays for what. Microgrids present a complicated equation since they are built to benefit specific locations, yet can serve the broader grid. It’s also not clear who should pay for microgrid maintenance and major capital requirements as the system ages — or who will operate the microgrids when they go into island mode, DEEP said.

“The cost and reliability impacts on microgrid versus non-microgrid customers need to be carefully considered,” DEEP said.

The state plans to offer an incentive of $450/kWh to businesses that want to install CHP.

DEEP also described “diseconomies of scale” associated with the energy security offered by microgrids.

“Thus, it is important to balance the costs versus benefits (including reliability benefits) of any microgrid system,” DEEP said.

The state plans to continue its push for more microgrids, combined heat and power (CHP) and other  distributed technologies that can help it overcome some persistent problems. Connecticut already has some of the highest electricity prices in the country, and now foresees a 63 percent rise in the generation service charge to customers by 2024. Natural gas shortages in New England,  caused by a lack of pipeline, are driving up wholesale power costs.

“If we fully take advantage of these opportunities, the state will be much closer to its goals regarding climate change, ensuring an adequate and diverse energy supply system in the future, and remaining competitive in a global economy,” DEEP said.

DEEP specifically called for new incentives to add 160 MW of combined heat and power in the state. CHP “can provide special value in locations where it can power microgrids,” as well avert upgrades to utility distribution system, and reduce natural gas use and electricity use, the plan said.

The CHP incentive, offered to businesses, will amount to $450/kWh. The state figures this is the right amount to allow businesses to achieve a reasonable payback, considering the estimated cost of installations, the value of the energy offset by the system, and the overall cost effectiveness of the system.

DEEP envisions creating a competitive process that offers CHP incentives in “blocks.”

Separately, Connecticut also is planning a third microgrid solicitation at a date yet to be specified. To find ways to improve the program, DEEP held a meeting with stakeholders on November 10 and conducted an online survey. The agency is reviewing the comments in preparation for designing the third solicitation.

Connecticut awarded nine microgrid projects $18 million from the first solicitation and two projects $5.1 million in the second.

DEEP is accepting comments on the draft integrated resource plan through February 11. Comments can be emailed to [email protected]

About the Author

Elisa Wood | Editor-in-Chief

Elisa Wood is an award-winning writer and editor who specializes in the energy industry. She is chief editor and co-founder of Microgrid Knowledge and serves as co-host of the publication’s popular conference series. She also co-founded RealEnergyWriters.com, where she continues to lead a team of energy writers who produce content for energy companies and advocacy organizations.

She has been writing about energy for more than two decades and is published widely. Her work can be found in prominent energy business journals as well as mainstream publications. She has been quoted by NPR, the Wall Street Journal and other notable media outlets.

“For an especially readable voice in the industry, the most consistent interpreter across these years has been the energy journalist Elisa Wood, whose Microgrid Knowledge (and conference) has aggregated more stories better than any other feed of its time,” wrote Malcolm McCullough, in the book, Downtime on the Microgrid, published by MIT Press in 2020.

Twitter: @ElisaWood

LinkedIn: Elisa Wood

Facebook:  Microgrids

Exploring the Potential of Community Microgrids Through Three Innovative Case Studies

April 8, 2024
Community microgrids represent a burgeoning solution to meet the energy needs of localized areas and regions. These microgrids are clusters of interconnected energy resources,...

MGK_PowerSecureCover_2021-07-28_7-54-20

‘Advanced Microgrids’ Provide Advanced Solutions

This white paper from PowerSecure looks at how advanced microgrids, designed with an understanding of the dynamics and evolution of the modern power grid, can create extraordinary...