Reports of Clean Energy’s Demise Have Been Greatly Exaggerated

Nov. 1, 2012
By Guest Blogger Stephen L. Cowell October 31, 2011 If the notion “he who lives by the subsidy dies by the subsidy” is true, then oil, gas and nuclear companies must be dying a thousand deaths. “A Sad Green Story,” the recent New York Times article by David Brooks, is way off the mark with where […]

By Guest Blogger Stephen L. Cowell
October 31, 2011

If the notion “he who lives by the subsidy dies by the subsidy” is true, then oil, gas and nuclear companies must be dying a thousand deaths.

“A Sad Green Story,” the recent New York Times article by David Brooks, is way off the mark with where we need to go as a country and as an entire planet. Now is not the time to malign investments in our health, welfare and a sustainable energy future.

The idea that our energy industry should be a free market, without “government interference,” is regrettably mistaken. The current influx of natural gas came from investments in shale drilling technology that had lots of government support beginning in the 1970s. Our entire electric grid is a public-private partnership where the government picked winning companies to receive a monopoly to develop and deploy electricity to every U.S. home with guaranteed returns on investments and the use of eminent domain laws to build power and pipe lines. The nuclear industry would not exist without massive subsidies and the oil and gas industries have had huge tax advantages and subsidies for decades, making investments in green energy seem like pocket change. Despite a few that have not fared well, many clean energy investments are paying off. At a 90 percent success rate, they’re far outpacing the success of private, venture-capital-funded companies and are employing thousands. In September, the Department of Energy announced having weatherized more than one million homes. The program has provided relief to millions of consumers in the way of energy savings and has stimulated the economy by adding thousands of jobs. For every dollar put into these programs, they have returned $2.5 dollars in benefits. And here’s something that should make both sides of the aisle happy: More than 90 percent of the equipment and materials used for these residential projects are manufactured in the U.S.

Mr. Brooks’s assertion that renewable energy is “not a jobs program” could not be further from the truth.

As of 2010, the clean energy industry accounts for more than 2.7 million jobs and outperformed fossil fuel jobs by a factor of two to one, according to The Brookings Institution. (Of note, jobs in clean energy also happen to pay well. By contrast, 40 percent of fossil fuel industry workers get the minimum wage, according to the Bureau of Labor Statistics.) It was just announced that all new electric energy generation in September was attributed to solar and wind. The latest “Energy Infrastructure Update,” also states that renewable energy accounted for 43.8 percent of new energy generated in 2011. This growth in wind, solar and other alternatives will surely support thousands of jobs now and in the future. In the energy efficiency industry, an often overlooked portion of the clean energy economy, there are five times the number of jobs more than in the coal or oil industries. These jobs are expected to increase four-fold in the next 10 years.

The $90 billion spent on green energy investments that continues to be replayed over and over again, is a wild exaggeration. This amount includes many other things like mass transit, power plant improvements and research grants — not just “green” energy projects. In terms of the loan recipients, the federal government has a very respectable track record. Of the 33 companies that received federal support, only three have gone out of business. This is hardly a “wasteful disappointment.” We should celebrate these success stories, instead of allowing them to be overshadowed by the Solyndras of the industry.

Last, but certainly not least, the article undermines an industry that helps mitigate climate change.

Have we forgotten about the dangerous summer heat waves that threatened dozens of states? Or the hurricane that affected the schedule of the Republican Convention? What about the tornadoes, severe thunderstorms and massive droughts we experienced all too recently? Are our memories that short? If the recent past doesn’t scare us, impending disaster should. “Frankenstorm,” a hurricane-winter storm mix, is threatening to wreak havoc on the east coast — just in time for Halloween. In a recent article from The Wall Street Journal, Daniel Yergen states, “The rapid growth of oil and natural gas production represents a major opportunity for the U.S.” We may be able to extend our fossil fuel addiction by another 30 years, but we can’t afford to close our eyes to long-term reality in the face of short-term economic conditions. We must continue supporting renewable energy and efficient technologies, or the planet, us, our children and future generations will suffer.

The one point that I do agree with Mr. Brooks on is the level of political partisanship that has grown up around the issue of energy and the environment. This does not help move good energy policies forward. But let’s be clear: Clean energy is not a sad story. When our political leaders continue to steer the country over the fossil fuel cliff, that’s the real tear-jerker.

Originally published in the Huffington Post 

About the Author

Elisa Wood | Editor-in-Chief

Elisa Wood is an award-winning writer and editor who specializes in the energy industry. She is chief editor and co-founder of Microgrid Knowledge and serves as co-host of the publication’s popular conference series. She also co-founded, where she continues to lead a team of energy writers who produce content for energy companies and advocacy organizations.

She has been writing about energy for more than two decades and is published widely. Her work can be found in prominent energy business journals as well as mainstream publications. She has been quoted by NPR, the Wall Street Journal and other notable media outlets.

“For an especially readable voice in the industry, the most consistent interpreter across these years has been the energy journalist Elisa Wood, whose Microgrid Knowledge (and conference) has aggregated more stories better than any other feed of its time,” wrote Malcolm McCullough, in the book, Downtime on the Microgrid, published by MIT Press in 2020.

Twitter: @ElisaWood

LinkedIn: Elisa Wood

Facebook:  Microgrids

Only through Standardization Can Microgrids Accelerate the Energy Transition

Jan. 18, 2024
Jana Gerber, North America microgrid president at Schneider Electric discusses how standardizing microgrids will accelerate the energy transition.

Get the full report

Energy Modeling: An Essential Step in Microgrid Projects

Learn how energy modeling can be used to determine the best energy mix for your microgrid, as well as determine how big it needs to be to achieve your project goals.